360 Feedback Blog

In this article, the writer states that 360 Degree Feedback should never be anonymous.  I disagree!

Whilst, ideally, we should all be mature enough to accept feedback directly from our colleagues - active acceptance is a lovely idea but somewhat unrealistic. 

As a 360 Degree Feedback designer, practitioner and coach, I know that it takes at least a couple of years to build employees’ and managers’ confidence in their organisation’s feedback processes - as well as in the the broader culture of management, accountability, and whether people get help or get pulped when they make a mistake.

I fear the writer is missing the big point of 360 Degree Feedback here: the point of 360 is not to avoid feedback from your colleagues (although I admit that it’s sometimes used like this). 

The point about 360 Degree Feedback is that it collates trends and consistent messages that are coming from many people, not just one, and therefore can provide information that one person’s experience can’t.  While individual comments and scores are useful, we coach people to look at consistent messages from the 360, not outliers. 

Therefore anonymity does not reduce the value of the feedback, and actually encourages people who would not have given feedback to do so.

Continuing on the theme of what makes a Boss great or really bad, this is a post by Robert Sutton at HBR, talking about how self-delusion, heedlessness to subordinates and being insulated from reality can make a Boss really terrible.  He calls it ‘Living in a Fool’s Paradise’. 

I remember working for someone many years ago who would aske us for our opinions and then either dismissed those opinions instantly (’no, we’re not going to do that’), or nodded and then did nothing. 

He ignored feedback on key areas such as customer responses, the changing market and how employees were feeling.   I used to dread talking to him and eventually I dreaded going into work. 

Consequently good employees didn’t hang around long and the business closed down, having lagged behind its competitors both commercially and operationally. 

My best boss, on the other hand, made me feel that my contributions were valuable, listened to me, allowed me to make some mistakes, and most importantly, backed me up when I did make a mistake.  I always knew I was supported.  She wasn’t perfect, but she made a huge difference to my professional confidence.

If you’ve got examples of great and terrible bosses, we’d love to hear about them.

360 Degree Feedback

This article from UK Training Zone talks about the mistakes we can make when trying to judge potential for future leadership.

I especially recognise the ‘I can judge potential by having a coffee with them’ as we all think we are better judges of potential (and other things) than we really are!

It’s especially important if we are going to treat people fairly and equitably that we have some very clear definitions of  what we want the ‘potential’ to be - I have been in situations where ‘potential’ is a handy way of promoting someone whose face fits, and who is liked by the boss, rather than someone who will be able to step up to a new role in the future. 

Therefore some systematic definition of skills (job description, 360 Degree Feedback) is important - testing, feedback and profiling are certainly not going to guarantee a perfect candidate, but  they will help to inform and support decisions that have to be made.  After all, what gets measured, gets managed!

This is a great list for effective Objective-Setting.

A key part of objective setting is to ensure that people have the right skills to be able to achieve their objectives - 360 Degree Feedback is a great way to do this.

This is a great blog from the ever-refreshing Peter Honey in People Management yesterday.  It’s about the recent claim that every school needs an incompetent teacher so that kids can learn how to deal with incompetence in the future.

If you take Peter’s path to its logical conclustion, we would also need a certain level of incompetence in the workplace to give people new and useful learning experiences in how to deal with incompetent managers and colleagues.  This would then require us to assess for Incompetence in the annual appraisal, ensure that new recruits had a certain level of Incompetence and inlcude Incompetence in leadership and senior manager development programmes!  

I like this reverse thinking so much, I’m even thinking of developing a Incompetency 360 Degree Feedback - any ideas of what you might like to include?!

In this poll, reported in the US, 68%  of managers believe that looks have an impact on the way managers rate job perforamance.

If this survey is to be believed, Attractiveness comes only below Experience and Confidence in recruitment situations, and trumps Education and a sense of Humour - apparently known as the ‘Hottie’ effect!  The author advises those of us who are non-Hotties not to despair but to make the best of whatever assets we have…..

On a more serious note though, how can we overcome these biases which appear to be inbuilt in most of us and can make a big difference in how employees’ performance is judged?

The first answer is Awareness: once we’re aware of our biases, our assumptions and things like the Halo and Horns Effect, we can start to adjust our opinions of that person and inject some objectivity into our appraisal of their performance  (for more on Halo/Horns, go to 360 Degree Feedback and download our paper entitled What Not To Do When Giving Great Feedback ).

Second is judging people on what they have actually done, so setting SMART objectives is critical (Specific, Measurable, Action-based, Relevant and Timely).

Third is making sure that your own judgement is not the only one that counts….tools like 360 Degree Feedback are very important in ensuring that a number of different people have input into the appraisal, and that there is consistency in assessing performance, especially in hard to measure areas like management, leadership and team working.

We love this concise business case for measuring and managing performance: in this clip from Radio 4’s The Bottom Line, Jacqueline de Rojas,  UK and Ireland vice-president of software company, McAfee, talks about the importance of ‘Inspecting what you expect’ - setting performance goals and regularly measuring against them.  

360 Degree Feedback, Appraisal and Performance Review are just as important for teams as they are for individual employees.

In this video interview in today’s Guardian, the author of The Black Swan, Nassim Nicholas Taleb has some very interesting things to say about power, knowledge, beliefs and behaviours. 

From a workplace point of view, we see that people behave differently on their own, within their team, within the organisation, and then collectively, as an organisation, interacting with the outside world.   Collective beliefs and behaviours have a big influence on the individual, so when we’re looking to make individual or organisational change happen, we need to analyse and understand what those collective beliefs and behaviours are, and how they are skewing the behaviours of individuals. 

Maybe if we’d done that with the banking sector a few years ago, we could have avoided some of the consequences of the actions and groupthink that have led to the current economic problems.

360 Degree Feedback

This article in People Management describes a new ‘720 Degree Feedback’ being put in place at Cadbury’s, the confectionary manufacturer. 

Instead of getting 360 Degree Feedback from people you work with, the 720 Degree concept is about getting feedback from people outside work, friends, family, spouses, children. 

I would agree that there’s certainly a lot more to a person than their workplace behaviours, but I can’t help feeling that 720 degree feedback may be overspinning it, if that’s not labouring the metaphor!

Seriously though, as a tool for looking at emotional intelligence and relationship skills, 720 Degree- feedback from friends and family - may well have some value.  However, given the closeness of those relationships , I think that the feedback from friends and family may be either too complimentary, or a little bit too critical?  Is either of those something I would want to share with my manager? And what could it do to those personal relationships? 

I’d love to hear what you think.

This article in Management Today describes the results of research carried out by the Carnegie Institute,  suggesting that 85% of our success is due to emotional intelligence.

So how do you know if you’re doing the things listed in the article, communicating clearly, giving feedback and praise, building trust and strong relationships, resolving conflict, and making change happen?

Most of us tend to think we’re quite good at these things - but what do those around us think? And how often do they give us honest feedback? And how useful would some honest feedback be in helping us to build our self-awareness?

If you’d like to know how Emotionally Intelligent you really are, 360 Degree Feedback is a really effective tool for this.

For a free trial of our Emotional Intelligence 360 Degree Feedback, go to Empower 360 and click on Free Trial - we’ll set you up straight away.