360 Feedback Blog

In this great article, the writer explains the physiology behind how we listen and how we interpret what we hear.  It’s certainly hard to stand back and listen objectively, and we can be very selective with what we hear, and what we do about it.

People can made immediate assumptions about what they think you’re telling them, and respond less than positively.

Good listening skills are a critical skill set that successful leaders, managers and influencers all demonstrate frequently or almost  all the time.They’re also one of the key skills that, with a bit of work, can complement and enhance someone who’s already got a broad range of good management or leadership skills.  A good way to become a better listener is to ask your colleagues to tell you each time they catch you not listening for what they’re trying to tell you, or ignoring their messages.  Becoming aware of this habit through feedback can help you to change and improve those critical skills.

 Setting goals and monitoring employees performance is a necessary part of making sure people are judged fairly on their work and that they have clear instructions on what is required of them. However, when we get too entrenched in numbers and figures we can begin to breed a workplace of disgruntled automatons who feel they are either incapable or not trusted enough to use their common sense and best judgement to make decisions. A case in point is described in the Harvard Business Review  where two US soldiers returning from Afghanistan were refused boarding on their flight because they had too many bags, and the airline employees were unable to take the decision to waive the fees and allow them to board. Cases like this are not only detrimental to the reputation of the company, but are also incredibly degrading for the staff who know what the right course of action would be but feel unable to take it for fear of reprisal.  

Whilst it is important to allow employees the structure of metrics to keep them clear on the achievements they need to make, it is also important to be clear on how they go about reaching those goals. As well as targets and performance indicators, employees should be given clear guidance on the behaviours, values and principles they need to adopt along the way, what is acceptable and what is not.  With that in place, employees can be given a degree of autonomy to make their own choices which will keep them happy and engaged and avoid the descent into robotic response.

For more inforamation on performance management and metrics, go to our 360 Degree Feedback, and download our free guides, Performance Management in Talent Centric Organisations, the Pros and Cons of 360 in performance appraisal, and more.

This article from Personnel Today talks about a dilemma we’re seeing with many of our clients: they want to be able to have a clear picture of the skills and capabilities of their people so that they can make sure the right people are in the right job, at the right time.  To analyse the skills gaps in your organisation, you need to ask the following questions:

1. What current and future skills do we need to achieve our goals?
2. Who’s got those skills, and where are they in the organisation?
3. Who’s not got those skills, and where are they?
4. What are the training and development gaps, and where
   are they?
5. Where are the areas of strength, and where do they
   lie?

As described in the article, this is such a critical area now because it’s vital to be able to keep the people
with the key skills we need, train and fill the gaps, and deal with underperformance clearly and
unambiguously.

We recommend the use of online tools such as 360 Degree Feedback and Performance Appraisal as a very effective and efficient way of measuring the skills gaps in your organisation.  Ensuring that the 360 Degree Feedback and Appraisal are aligned with the organisation’s capabilities, you should be able to easily measure and report on training needs at individual, group and organisation level.

I’ve been following the current Apprentice series on BBC TV, and last night’s episode was a corker - here’s the Guardian blog, which gives you the sequence of events plus some witty commentary.  Of particular interest to me was how Jim, who escaped being fired, suddenly plummeted in popularity with the candidates and Lord Sugar. I was intrigued as to how someone who had been universally popular with the team and with Lord Sugar, could fall so quickly from grace.  It has clearly been a case of Halo Effect.

The Halo Effect happens when someone does one or more high-visibility, successful actions or tasks.  They may be very specific, in Jim’s case, it was a very effective negotiation a number of weeks back. This one action or task creates an impression of high performance in all areas, which is also reinforced by group concensus, hence a ‘Halo’.   

In Jim’s case, because of the negotiation, he gained a reputation as a ’strong candidate’, and one of the fired candidates, Vincent, had been only too happy to seek Jim’s opinion and advice throughout.   In the end, Jim proved to be vindictive, unwilling to take responsibility and ineffective in the task, and both the remaining candidates and Lord S were visibly shocked at this ‘change’ in their perception of Jim.

The Halo Effect can be a serious problem for you if you have to assess or grade someone’s performance, or if you are asked give 360 Degree Feedback, or particularly if you are assessing ‘potential’ for talent and leadership pools. 

It’s difficult to avoid the Halo Effect - after all, our brains are designed to create short cuts to speed up decision making - and its sister, the Horns Effect.  But just being aware of the biases in our thinking, and also how easy it is to be swayed by ‘group think’, helps in balancing our understanding of someone’s strengths and weaknesses.

In this article from Personnel Today, a recent survey shows that confidence in senior management has hit an all time low, as well as job satisfaction and, by default, engagement.

Senior managers need now, more than ever, to be able to engage with their teams and their organisations in a meaningful and effective way.

How effectively are your senior managers engaging with people?  As individuals and as teams, how good are they at keeping people informed, engaged and motivated? Or is it possible they are demotivating people through being unaware of some of their daily behaviours in the workplace?

A customised 360 Degree Feedback will provide you with the information you need to understand what’s happening with your senior teams, and how you can help them improve specific skills and behaviours.

This article describes the effect of bad appraiser skills combined with poor 360 Degree Feedback design.

One of the key messages for using 360 correctly is that statements such as
“You’re not liked in this organisation”are not useful or practical kinds  of feedback! 

Also, although the article talks about 360 Feedback, it appears that the pain described is coming from the appraising manager’s lack of skills in giving feedback,
not the 360 feedback itself, which should be a reflection of key consistent messages
coming from all the raters, not the opinion of just one person.

We are often asked to brief people in our client organisations about the best way to give feedback in a 360 Degree Feedback exercise.

Here’s a link to a short video that explains the key areas and some hints and tips for giving great 360 feedback.

In this article, the writer discusses the new relationship between employees and the organisations they work for, and how this is affecting employee engagement.

Transparency is really important, and not just in particular areas like senior pay and bonuses. Senior management needs to be honest about what’s going on and what they’re doing about it - employees are not stupid and they know when they’re being PR’d!

A great example is Vineet Nayar, CEO of HCL Technologies, who spent a year talking to staff around the world about the company’s problems, asked them what needed to change, and went on to publish his own 360 Degree Feedback on the company intranet!

Track critical engagement factors in your organisation with Climate Check from Track Surveys.

Track Surveys Empower 360

This article describes a Face to Face 360 Degree Feedback process that she experienced with her best ever boss.

Face to face feedback like this can be a very effective tool for managers and teams
to use both at appraisal time and  regularly throughout the year.

Of course, the managers that need the feedback the most are the ones that are least likely to volunteer for it!

So while it’s good to give managers a choice, if you really want to give managers an
awareness of their blind-spots (and their strengths too), and you want to build a consistent level of skills in the manager group, the feedback needs to:

1. Be based on the same questions for each manager and each person giving the feedback
2. Have an element of anonymity so that the feedback from those reluctant to give face-to-face feedback, is also recorded.
3. Be reportable in a format that is easy to read and understand

 After all, even smart people need feedback!

Here’s a great slide presentation on Performance Appraisal. It includes how to use 360 Degree Feedback as part of the appraisal.