March 4th, 2010 |
Published in
360 Degree Feedback, 360 appraisal, Feedback, Measuring Performance, Team Performance

In this article John Herlihey of Google explains the company’s view of the importance of performance reviews and 360 Degree Feedback:
“We measure people every 90 days. We get 360-degree feedback on people every 180 days and that feedback is published to the whole company. People want reality. Ninety per cent of the rewards end up going to 10pc of the people”.
3 monthly reviews and 6 monthly 360 Feedback is certainly tough and takes a lot of effort and commitment from the company the staff.Â
Critically, What it does do is keep people really focused on what the key things they need to do, on what they learn and how to put that learning into practice.
Google’s focus on constant review, feedback and action is probably one of the reasons for its success.
September 16th, 2009 |
Published in
Employee engagement, Feedback, Measuring Performance, Team Performance, motivation
This article in today’s Guardian appears to show evidence that people work better in teams.
However, in an article in Harvard Business Review called ‘Why Teams Don’t Work, the authors debunk the myth that teams are the answer to every performance issue, and that teams always perform better than individuals working on their own. They question the whole idea of ‘team dynamic’ as an absolute, consistently positive force.
Common misconceptions about teams include:
Teams that work harmoniously together are better and more productive than teams that don’t: there is more evidence that teams who are more productive, and are recognised as a team for it,  get on better together because of their good performance, not the other way around.
Teams work better because the work is shared out, and the bigger the team, the more effective: unfortunately this is cancelled out by the difficulty of keeping the right people informed as the team gets bigger, so big teams are not necessarily a good idea.
Teams should be renewed constantly to encourage creativity: again, this is not proven by evidence. In fact the more productive teams were those who had been together for a number of years and understood each other deeply. Many teams are never given enough time to settle in and learn to work together.
In a research paper called ‘The Romance of Teams’, (Allen and Hecht, 2004), the authors conclude that the reasons people like working in teams are mainly because of the social interaction, because
- team members feel good being part of a successful team
- people also feel somewhat ’sheltered’ in a team, and
- they can blame someone else on the team if something goes wrong!
To ask a question or share ideas about team performance and how you can measure it, go to
http://tracksurveys.co.uk/AskTrack.aspx
 For more information, articles and resources on teams and team performance measurement, contact me on jo.ayoubi@tracksurveys.co.uk
or go to:
www.tracksurveys.co.uk , scroll down and click on Team Performance Dynamics in the right hand panel.